Three centre-backs are able to hold the defense more securely and enable Cole and Bosingwa to play more like midfielders with even less defensive responsibility than they have now. Luiz can move forward to play the defensive midfield role as need...
deg0ey | 22.02.2011 | Comments: 3
I previously made: http://this11.com/topics/show/4692/attack-chelseaAfter discussion (on the comments section and other places) I revised the squad. Essien and Lampard would be interchangeable per preference (there are pros and co...
RFMH | 25.02.2011
FC Copenhaga vs. Chelsea, Oitavos de Final Liga dos Campeões 2010/11
Dragonite | 22.02.2011 | Comments: 1
The diagram shows the open spaces left unmanned by the Milan defence and midfield. Spurs were spot on in exposing these spaces and increase fluidity in their play.
parth.pandya | 16.02.2011 | Comments: 1
4-3-1-2 vs 4-4-1-1
pitchaction | 15.02.2011 | Comments: 1
Basically, Spurs would play their regular 4-4-2, but with Pienaar more narrower than usual, as he tries to exploit Gattuso and be the main source of creativity through the middle, Defoe would drop deep at times to deal with the midfield, and ...
some1 | 12.02.2011 | Comments: 3
Time completamente reformulado , apenas 3 jogadores do elenco inicial , no time titular !
Cáss97 | 19.02.2011
goals galore
leslie | 14.02.2011 | Comments: 1
Chelsea version 1
dragonulteo | 19.02.2011
Copenhaga v.s Chelsea
dragonulteo | 19.02.2011
i think that this is a perfect formation for this team let loose the old gatuso and Pirlo they are excelent players but they do not corespond vith the today football
martinACMilano | 22.09.2010 | Comments: 5
AC's formation is vulnerable to attacking full backs. Milan's strikers have little defensive responsibility; so with the Italians' full backs occupied by Lennon and Bentley, Bale and Hutton can fly forward and do real damage. Huddlestone ...
Jamiegc | 30.12.2010 | Comments: 2
